If universities are to be cleaned, the Research Excellence Framework should allow replication strategy and publishing
The only way to stop the bad practice is to eliminate academic culture that rewards. Today, science is facing a serious problem in the form of academic fraud, Alok Jha as noted. As easy as it is to condemn and punish fraud, the real challenge is to understand what it means, why it happens and how it can be avoided.
In essence, scientific fraud violates every moral and ethical codes that scientists away. And beyond, it violates the right. Why, after all, a commitment to humble wages and long hours of the academy award that sacrifice can not grant another career, that of discovering authentic?
most scientific activity, of course, answer this question in a heartbeat. Discovery is a true story increasingly blunted by the bureaucracy and the commercialization of university life. Meanwhile, the "success" of science ego massage leads to promotion, and declares the winner as a powerful authority and trust. Added to this, the competition for academic positions is at its peak and research funding is stretched to the limit.
No wonder, then, that to survive in the academic world, much less thrive, scientists now have to play with the system in a way that would have horrified our ancestors. Outright fraud is just the tip of the iceberg. Below, a rough sea questionable practices covering physical, biological and social.
publish in journals with the highest impact, we are told, even if it found that mathematically illiterate. Many post (and many) communication, we were informed, even if it means slicing. Exaggerate our findings to magazine publishers hoping Articles Nature or Science will reap disproportionate rewards professionals - we accept all rewards are ridiculous, while in the same breath, they give each other. And do not worry about editing experiments showing no statistically significant effects due to the "top" journals do not care that new positive results present a "breakthrough".
ScienceFor those outside of these practices may seem outrageous, but scientists fall into a gray area of ??malpractice fraud that dwarfs many. Driven by the pressure to produce more to be discovered, many scientists to apologize or to participate in various stages of neglect. The less scrupulous to push the limits even the results of picking cherries, analysis of massage, or even outright data fabrication.
- There is a lot we can do to solve this problem by making science more transparent, for example by requiring scientists freely publish their raw data. And we also need a culture in which is included the methodology used for scientific experiments to the public before the investigation, as is the case today with clinical trials.
Now imagine a science in which research grants and classifications of the Research Excellence Framework is not awarded based on the number of articles published in a scientific journal "top", and not their connections sociopolitical, and not in its index dimensions ho any metric "impact" - but simply on the number of times that other scientists could successfully replicate their work Imagine a science actively seeking other scientific replication was rewarded with personal success and funding instead of being derided as boring. Imagine a science where the quality and reliability of the results exceeded the amount of all aspects, so much so that the number of individual production was almost irrelevant. And imagine a science in which "a career" journals like Nature and Science, is simply not exist -. A world in which the investigation has been classified by the subject before being peer-reviewed and published in an open, freely accessible to all
In this system, a culture of neglect would be eliminated.
Find best price for : --Replication----imagine--
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(407)
-
▼
October
(37)
- After Ben-Ali's conviction: the state of Tunisian ...
- Manchester gets ready for a parade to celebrate it...
- Abu Yahya al-Libi and this perpetually self-defeat...
- South Africans offered free phone for every 60 rat...
- Let's raise a toast to alcohol | Mark Liam Piggott
- South African authorities offer free phone for eve...
- May's jobs report hurts Obama's re-election prospe...
- No public interest definition can really apply to ...
- Where are women's rights in plans to tackle rape i...
- GCSEs not fit for purpose, says CBI
- Parenting classes are a good idea. But families ne...
- Sam Hallam walked free, escaping a fate almost wor...
- Does Buddhism need the supernatural stuff? | Andre...
- The Azerbaijanis who aren't feeling the Eurovision...
- Everton 3-1 Newcastle United | Premier League matc...
- Gay Americans' risk of mistaking marriage equality...
- Lunch dances: reel meals | Observer editorial
- Chen Guangcheng's nephew charged with voluntary ma...
- Q&A with Naomi Wolf: the spectacle of terror
- Houston Dynamo have a new home as MLS puts down it...
- Sheffield Wednesday 2-0 Wycombe
- Warren Buffett urges 'shared sacrifice' as he defe...
- Chen wants seat on Clinton's plane
- Syria promises Kofi Annan it will respect ceasefire
- Syria promises Annan it will respect ceasefire
- Just trash TV? No, there are beating hearts here |...
- Afghanistan: our modern opium war | Pratap Chatterjee
- Turkmenistan leader keeps grip on power despite cr...
- Stevenage's unbeaten warriors finally fall to Colc...
- Spain's BBVA bank plans ?8.7m fire sale of unwante...
- Championship roundup: Hull City suffer second stra...
- Napoli hit the summit after Cavani's hat-trick - a...
- Napoli hit the summit after Cavani's hat-trick - a...
- Mike Baker, 'a seeker of the truth'
- Replication is the only solution to scientific fra...
- 'We're doing medicine in a really inefficient way,...
- Chile: making investment in science a national pri...
-
▼
October
(37)
0 comments:
Post a Comment