Have a Good NEWS

anti-cuts campaign of false economy obtained data from 265 responses from freedom of information to local councils

More than 2,000 charities are forced to close services and staff bag for local governments to reduce their land or in some cases completely remove, according to a study released Tuesday.

The study - based on the freedom of 265 responses from local councils in England and obtained by the economy supported by the false anti-union campaign cuts - reveals the extent of the impact the cuts are having in the voluntary sector. Birmingham City Council has cut funding for many charitable organizations, with over 190 organizations to lose, followed by the boards of the Inter-Organization Council in London, which has cut funding for 174 groups.

Charities

Many will have their funding cut in half, while others will lose all budgets. Most affected are children and young people charities, with over 380 organizations involved. Other disabilities 150, 142 seniors and over 110 charities that care for adults are also affected.

Search

immediately raised questions about the role of charities as the cornerstone of the government of "high society". Brendan Barber, general secretary of the TUC, which sponsors a false economy, he said: "The big company is looking increasingly like a big ... With these deep cuts to voluntary groups across the UK show that the demands of government agencies can replace direct services currently provided by the central or local government are false. "

false economy says his study shows more than $ 110 000 000 United States this year will disappear from the line of charity "low despite this analysis, the first attempt to map the extent of cuts in England, including major cities such as Leeds and Manchester, as well as some large counties and the Conservatives county or municipal Hampshire flagship Westminster. These councils have refused to disclose data on the grounds that it would take too long to extract the information.

The experts also questioned whether the voluntary sector could cover the sharp decline in funding for local governments. Tony Travers, London School of Economics said that local authorities last year had to endure more than 4 billion pounds in cuts - amounting to a decrease of 8% in real terms: "Ministers have established a much bigger challenge in the hope of expanding the voluntary sector and NGOs on behalf of the excellent partnership with the size of these reductions. "

The government blamed the advice of "being short-sighted in their approach, [and] does not recognize the importance of this sector." A spokesman for the Department of Communities and Local Government, said: "In its approach to budgeting, the best advice is to demonstrate that they understand that the strength of the sector, growing volunteer is more important now than ever and could be the key to providing high quality services good value to its residents. But this is not the case everywhere. "

M. Merrick Cockell
, president of the local government has defended its decision to cut budgets in times of austerity. "The severity of the cuts in the budgets of the Board means savings to be made in all areas, and unfortunately, funding for charities, voluntary organizations and community groups are not exempt."

Find best price for : --Merrick----Hampshire----Leeds----local--