Sunday, May 12, 2013

Reacting to child abuse by lowering the age of consent would be cruel | Ellie Cumbo

10:25 AM | Posted by Free Game Zone | | Edit Post

lawyer Barbara Hewson denounces "persecution of the old." She is not the only criticism of the law who should know better

Last replication

following revelations Rochdale Jimmy Savile and has not been another famous from the list of defendants name, but an attempt to reject an obvious turning like a little moral panic. Lawyer Barbara Hewson writes sharp magazine operation Yewtree announced by most as a clear case of success for a long time, in fact participate in "the persecution of the old." It makes sense, if you believe as (as Hewson apparently) nothing less than "flogging and rape in padded rooms" is not a "very serious assault."

But perhaps the most disturbing part of the article Hewson concluded that the priority should be to simply reduce the age of consent. Yewtree Having concluded that most victims of Savile were in the 13-16 age group, it is perverse, and not backed up with any mention of the fact that children of this age have sufficient capacity to consent - all the principle of the law in the first place. As such, the amounts to your suggestion nothing more than a large and very ugly carpet to sweep the problem -. In addition to being surprisingly harsh to victims who came to speak to us about the long-term impact of violence

is important to note at this point a fact that has somehow been lost in the media coverage, and it does not really seem exercise of criminal law Hewson. The most immediate harm your article could do is think about the victims that these ideas are mostly in the hands of those who defend or prosecute these cases - and they wonder about the victims. The objective of the level of the criminal justice response to these cases could not be more different, as evidenced by the work of the service of the Crown to reform the way claims are handled in the future.
  • Hewson has not yet, however, inadvertently revealed something important, which is the lack of feedback from the media informed on legal issues such as the age of consent, they do not need and deserve to be debated Outside the court and law schools. Some commentators social media reacted to his room to attack personally or calling their discipline, but what they lack is that it is not quite one voice. Actually, your article is by no means the first to destroy the issue of sexual consent recently.
In particular, there is a disturbing habit of criticizing law on consent without being in full possession of the facts (I'm looking at you, George Galloway, and said that as the BBC). The issue of lowering the age of consent, usually based on a misunderstanding of how business is done fairly regularly also resurfaced. The most recent example of this was Peter Tatchell, who believes that the current law threatens to condemn the violent teens when he sleeps with partners who, although very close to them in age, are under 16.

Although the law theoretically classify it as a crime, is for CPS to decide whether what seems a clear violation of the law is actually in the public interest to prosecute. Which, as stated in its guidance to the public, it is in the case of teenagers who agree: "Children of the same or similar age is very unlikely to be prosecuted for engaging in sexual activity where the consensual activity and no abuse or exploitation. "


Find best price for : --George----Rochdale----Savile----Jimmy----Hewson--

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blogger Template created with Artisteer.