Thursday, November 24, 2011




Last

leak appears to be an attempt to undermine public support for international action on climate change before the negotiations in Durban

fresh round hacked climate science emails leaked online

. Q & A: 'Climategate'

climate scientists have mounted a vigorous defense of their work and discussions on science, after more than 5000 personal emails were leaked online, in an apparent attempt to undermine public support for action internationally to combat climate change.

more than 39,000 pages of emails and scientists from the University of East Anglia (UEA) were loaded on a server and a link to Russian websites, they skeptical of climate change on Tuesday almost exactly two years after a similar release of e-mails or pirated leak in the run up to Copenhagen climate talks in 2009.

Norfolk Police also responded to criticism that its invesitgation it launched in 2009 had not yet e-mail to any arrest. A spokesman described as a complex and unusual, adding that the investigation had "been determined and persistent in monitoring all relevant lines of research," including the most recent backup of e-mail. " / Aa>

finger

a selection of quotes from emails that appear to support the criticism that followed the first series of emails - that scientists have been very secretive about their data, sometimes, destruction of tests to avoid be considered is for political reasons. and were selectively choice of models and statistics to support the theory that the Earth's climate has warmed over the last century due to emissions of greenhouse gases caused by humans

But when read in connection with the full email in which they appear, go read very differently, scientists at the counter.

an e-mail from Professor Phil Jones, now director of research at the Climate Research Unit (CRU), University of East Anglia, for example, at first glance, seems to doubt the cornerstone of climate science. He wrote that "all models are wrong." However, he explained that he did not refer to all climate models, but try the new models by an average of existing ones, Jones believes that they are quite complex.

In another email

discuss the graphs of past temperature measurements Jones says that "we are choosing to show periods of warming." This, said Jones at a conference at the Science Centre of Media in London, it was because the graphics needed to show what the data showed that there was a warming trend in both sets, from 1901-2005 and 1970 -2005 ". Periods show a warming They have not been pre-selected to show warming, "he said.

After the 2009 e-mails, the university will conduct a survey conducted by Sir Alastair Muir Russell, who concluded last year that the university had not been open enough to respond to requests under the Freedom of Information Act, but supported scientists published papers on climate change and said there was no evidence that they were deliberately keeping information from the IPCC reports and magazines.

Yet blogger Steve McIntyre climate, however, sent to the freedom of information requests to Jones, said the investigation Muir Russell was not complete enough to alleviate public concerns. "It's partly because they are all friends and do not want to criticize others," said McIntyre. "This is great if you're writing about archeology Assyrian, but if you write articles that will be used for public policy when there is an obligation on people to criticize what needs to be criticized. "

Many scientific institutions rivals also released in support of Jones and colleagues, suggesting that the criticism of other researchers, resulting in e-mails showed that scientists were a good job of testing work of others.

There was also widespread concern about the apparent attempt to undermine the possibilities for government action to reduce emissions of climate change negotiations in a year from South Africa Monday .

"The context of the real world is the continued increase in the atmosphere of human carbon dioxide generated and proof that our ability to prevent dangerous levels of climate change is fading," said Chris Rapley, a professor of climate science at University College London. "Unfortunately, the messages pirates and their supporters are trying to feed a need for all-too-human. Climate change is bad news. This is true not only for obvious reasons of interest, but for all of us, including is derived from the prosperity of its underlying causes. "

The police investigation
Norfolk police confirmed Wednesday that the operator's cab, the two-year investigation in the original e-mails on the Internet in late 2009, is underway and the new version was "s interest "and will be considered by the survey.



Find best price for : --Climate----Norfolk----Detective----College----Chris----Steve----Muir----Jones----Phil----University--

0 comments:

Blog Archive