Have a Good NEWS

Hostage

his base, the GOP is seen as pro-freedom in certain matters, but shameless and intrusive in others. We can not win like that

In the wake of President Obama's re-election, the Republican Party is in the midst of great need for introspection. Although this idea is critical, it is also essential that we misdiagnosis Republicans or "spin" the reasons for our loss. Ultimately, defeat Mitt Romney is the result of a Republican Party fractured by the intellectual and ideological conflict.

Ultimately, the success of the presidential election coalitions are not based on a party: basic math tells us that simply are not enough Democrats or Republicans foam pillars for a candidate win . Therefore, in order to win the election, a candidate must build, motivate and mobilize a broad coalition that engages positively the majority of voters. But when, as with the current Republican Party, a coalition is divided by "fracture" ideational voters inevitably hemorrhage. Unless the Republicans on our break, the result of 2016 will not be as bad as in 2012, but will be even worse

In my opinion, the failure of the current GOP coalition is divided into three basic intellectual divide, the relationship between state and individual fracture and failure of national identity. Firstly, let us consider the intellectual divide.

At present, the Republican Party is a home for both the student of politics and whoever hates studious. This contrast was crystallized from very different Republican Party Vice President candidate in 2008 and 2012. When 2008 gave Republicans Sarah Palin, the charismatic populist warrior railing against the "liberal elites", the reverse of 2008 Paul Ryan, a man who revels in the immersion of complex issues. While the Republican base was greatly enamored of Palin and Ryan both, beyond the excitement of the campaign season, there are obvious problems in the presence of such a clear dichotomy of style and substance.

When Sarah Palin attack

academic "elites" and policy frameworks such questions as "gotcha" attacks, the effect is not simply to excite the elements of the Republican base, but also to promote persistent perception in the minds of independent voters debate and compromise are the irreconcilable enemies of the Republican brand. This is evident in the response to comments influential intellectual conservative Republican Bill Kristol was Sunday, when he suggested that, as part of a broader agreement debt, raise taxes on millionaires not to ruin the country. Instead of recognizing the benefits conservatives willing to negotiate in good faith (the preservation of our military), many conservatives rather Kristol called a traitor.

election expenses of this fetish orthodoxy goes well beyond the loss of Romney. Ask former Senators Richard Lugar and Scott Brown. Instead lost his job because his willingness to engage in bipartisanship is characterized by its principal rival as a form of "elitist" treason. Brown has lost, at least in part, because his opponent was able to associate with Brown as the winner of the Republican candidates Lugar, Mourdock, boasting language absolutist ideological purity. Therefore, in the case of Brown and experience, we see the catastrophic dynamics arising from the pursuit of purity as an end in itself.

This purity cost two Republican seats in the Senate, the loss of a leader in bipartisan foreign policy, the isolation of Republican voters in Massachusetts and a further decline republican identity. Not good.

The family problem? Too many Republican policies actively alienate minority voters GOP environment. While Republicans could point to Marco Rubio and Condoleezza Rice as representatives of the voters of a minority party inclusive view as aggressive anti-immigration law (see Arizona Governor Jan Brewer). Minority voters also heard of electric fences and "self-deportation". Voters also find minority Republican attacks on their right to freedom of worship.

Find best price for : --Republican----Massachusetts----Palin----Sarah--