Have a Good NEWS

Base "sure" that the late night negotiations opposition

obtained according to the regulatory status based

An agreement between the parties for a new press regulation based on status seemed to have arrived on Monday, Jobs said he is confident reopened negotiations had reached an agreement that could put the viable deputies.

not likely to be a fierce propaganda battle for whether the Prime Minister has blinked, and stood firm to protect the press that some media considered unacceptable interference.

Hacked Off campaign

Group said it was likely a copy of the agreement. Dr Evan Harris, former Liberal Democrat and Hacked Off associate director, said. "Victims. Shall be willing to accept this compromise ... But we do not say that it is Leveson, Leveson but close

"The fact that no agreement of all parties, the press are much more likely to fulfill their part of what they have to do - is the creation of a regulatory body recognized and then join - but not always detailed problems to overcome, "he said.

"The victims are very clear that the outstanding issues in detail - not according to the letter, but in the main incentives legislation around -. It is therefore important for them than any detail in the letter "

Apparently, according to a source at No. 10, the Labour Party has recognized the press code and property committee idea of ??a general purpose clause that allows the committee to exclude recognition regulator failed. There have been concerns that the papers would be able to write your own code to the press, but must be played by a regulatory body composed mainly of representatives nonrecurring.

conservatives lost ground to accept the excuses that can be processed by the controller is not only necessary -. Seen by lawyers as a substantive difference

addition, the government has recognized that the newspaper industry can not have a veto on the accession to the regulator, one of the main points of contention between the industry and Hacked Off, the group representing victims of press intrusion.

source

Conservative Labour said it would withdraw its version of the letter itself, or does not support it in the House of Commons later on Monday, showing that ground has shifted. Instead, a new way has been found to ensure that the regulator "can not be messed about."

No. 10 A source said: ... "The work is a victory parade when there is none of this is nonsense view of Prime Minister has always been pragmatic and principled do not see the point of having a newspaper regulator it not acceptable to the parties and the industry press will be ignored. "

Maria Miller, the Secretary of Culture, insisted there was a clear acceptance by Labour and the Liberal Democrats real Prime Minister's letter was the right thing to do. She said: "We will not have this extreme force of the law on the press that we had a clause to the contrary will be sitting next to the letter, is a non-exchange, there is no legal basis the claim is simply not ... maybe change in the future. This is already incorporated in the Charter. "

The three leaders will discuss the reworked Royal Charter in Monday morning and is expected then there will be a declaration of Commons. Amendments to the Crown Bill courts - except that the need for punitive damages -. Then it moved, according to a work

Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman, who was part of the negotiating team on the night of Sunday, said the press regulation letter was published Monday morning and stands before both Houses parliament later in the day.

Harman also said that an amendment would be included in the company and the Bill of regulatory reform - which is primarily responsible for the investment bank Government's Green - making it illegal Charter for change without a two-thirds majority in parliament.

Speaking to the Today program on BBC Radio 4, Harman said: "The [regulatory] framework created in the actual letter, not by law ... but just to make sure that the letter itself is in charge of the Privy Council - which is actually ministers - just to be sure that ministers can not be hurt in the future, there is only a small piece of legislation in the House of Lords, now says he can not change or dilute this letter. "

Amendment Bill said, "has a legal basis, because we do not want is to have a situation where everyone agrees that rules should be based on, and then press the Ministers and Ministers water down ".

"Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, all believe that Lord Leveson put in your report was really just ... I think this is the strengthening of the press because the press can not have the power to realize if they abuse their power. "

George Eustice, the main advocate tougher laws conservative press hailed the agreement. He said: "This is a very good deal that is fair to all parties."
Find best price for : --Labour----press----Miliband----Clegg----Tory----Lords----Liberal----Hacked--