Have a Good NEWS

Levi Bellfield

test for the murder of Milly Dowler has shown that change is necessary. So instead of promising privileges for convictions, which must endanger the loss of privileges for failed and "bad guys" do not plead guilty

Much concern was expressed about the anguish inflicted on the family Dowler, especially Robert Dowler, during the recent trial of Levi Bellfield for the murder of nine years ago Dowlers "13 year old daughter, Milly. It is obvious that the trial Bellfield an opportunity to continue to do something you want - to inflict extreme cruelty. The defenders of the status quo that court cases are regrettable but necessary. So also the rejection of many media critics emotional, I think there is now an opportunity to examine whether the extraordinary freedom granted to the accused in court is provided with ropes instead of the very few requirements.

Our judicial system is, of course, adversarial and inquisitorial. The jury heard two stories, and decide, basically, if the history of the allegation is sufficiently credible to support the alternative scenarios proposed by the defense. This looks just equality. But it is not. Prosecution witnesses must tell the truth. Everything else is perjury. Defendants may lie. Bellfield has lied from the moment he offered his "not guilty".

worse, in some cases, witnesses are not allowed to tell the truth. It made me very aware of this anomaly when deep was the main witness in the trial of a thief who was caught in my house.

The thief had called at our door and penetrates through my four year old son while I was eating and solve their three-month-old brother. I knew nothing of what I have found my son sitting in the front door with the door open. He said he had opened the door - which at the time had glass panels - "the lady in the red dress." Where was this lady now? She had risen, "to see daddy."

understand that there is an intruder in the house, I took the children to the room and called my husband at his office in the attic that you alert. The phone is busy. Realizing he would have to check myself, I began to crawl up the stairs. A hooded figure fleeing down. I screamed, the figure began to run, and I caught as he tried to cut the front door. My husband and a passerby responded to the shock, and its contents, while I called the police.

Police have accused the girl of theft and injury (he had bitten his hand hard, trying to let go). Even if there were elements missing from the house, the police accuse him of theft. She had no evidence of it. She had obviously been in and out and gave as an accomplice. This could not be proved, while the police decided it was best not to complicate matters. But it was the first really could not say.

But his good deed had been completely misunderstood, and had landed in this mess incredibly terrible. Their letter went further in his summary. Citing the case of James Bulger, argued that people like the accused dared to intervene and save the children because people like me, their motivations so grossly distorted type. People like me, he said, were responsible for "Walk On By" society. People like me who spits with contempt, and never see an innocent woman to jail rather than admit that he saw that the wrong people.

Find best price for : --Robert----Dowler----Milly----Bellfield----Levi--