Have a Good NEWS

brief quotations are social relations, but when it happens to someone else's work as your own, you're a plagiarist

I know that many people do not agree on when and if it is OK to play creative works without permission. There are long and thoughtful discussions on the duration of copyright should last, if the work is funded by the State should be treated as private created if the scientific and academic work should be freely available, what kind of work identified as " creative, "and, of course, fair use / fair and should not be allowed.

But even though I know that many pirates proud, do not think I've never heard of a person standing for plagiarism a good, old-fashioned.

plagiarism and copyright infringement

are two different things, of course.

Shakespeare is copyright, but if you try to fool someone into thinking you wrote Romeo and Juliet, you're still a plagiarist.

Even

copyright most dedicated fans it is clear that they are treated fairly brief quotations, but when it happens to someone else just as yours, you're a plagiarist .

Indeed, the application of copyright is sometimes so close to the detection of plagiarism - such as Turnitin, a piece of software that helps teachers catch students who copy other works was sued for copyright infringement students. The plaintiffs argued that the creation of a database of students to compare the roles they suspect a violation of the copyright of the authors. Proceedings before a U.S. court found that activity constituted fair use. I'm not sure how it would have been in the UK - our fair treatment is in many ways more restrictive than the U.S. fair use

Some of the most blatant forms of plagiarism are perfectly legal. Fans of indie geek troubadour Jonathan Coulton were furious to discover that the Fox television show Glee was "deceived" available distinctive "Baby Got Back", including new characters and sound effects that are unique to Coulton version. Fox evasive when Glee music producer Anders Alex Twitter:. "Some people can not see the opportunity when it hits them in the face" (it was clear at the time that Anders commented Coulton, but later removed the tweet and said it was a comment on another topic) . A more detailed analysis of the two parties is even more reprehensible than it sounds and looks like Fox version actually uses parts of recordings Coulton, cutting voice mixed.

(Coulton took revenge on his own Fox has reprinted "Baby Got Back" and presented as a recovery version of Glee, and the profits to charity - rose iTunes table, while Version Fox was beaten by angry fans Coulton who gave one star reviews)

Why
Fox sin stick in the craw of the Internet? I think it is because Fox has not only wronged Coulton: have harmed the public. We were misled about the origin of a product that needs to buy.

Find best price for : --internet----Coulton----copyright--