Conservatives are wrong: marriage is not conducive to social stability and economic prosperity. This is backwards
traditionalists who oppose the rights of same-sex marriage are losing the war, and they know it.
Some have a new strategy: instead of scaremongering on gay marriage, will target single mothers and low-income women. Although he categorically trump social importance of marriage are simply moral scolds - comfortable with gender and dedicated to values ??that lead to high rates of divorce, unwanted pregnancies and poverty. They call it a "Call for a new conversation about marriage," but just the same argument in new dress regressive approved clothing gay marriage.
At the heart of this appeal is a hostility towards women and a reductive vision of the family and the economy. His "call" does not talk much, which states that marriage is an economic savior die mysteriously, and implicitly accuses single mothers disappearance of the unity of the middle class civil.
So why the American media and workers who leave an institution that would make them richer and more stable? Why harm society, their children and themselves? Maybe marriage is not a panacea. Perhaps the Conservatives who defend marriage are incredibly hostile to women and have even developed policies that harm low-income women -. Give less choice and change the definition of marriage
highly educated heterosexual women, meanwhile, has never been better. Although college-educated white women tend to marry later, are more likely to stay married. Black women with a university degree are more likely to marry than those who do not, and some college women generally report happier marriages than any other group. The reasons are undoubtedly complex, but it seems to boil down to the maturity of age and experience: a combination of a more developed sense of self, personal requirements for the company, and financial stability after several years work in school.
For these women, marriage offers financial stability that makes conservatives say it is the best for all, or a ticket out of poverty. But this marriage between two financially independent, highly educated people are not better off because marriage equals stability, but (because two people have a wide range of options, the relatively equal bargaining power, and resources to handle the ups and downs almost inevitable financial and other).
The conservative argument for marriage is just wrong. Marriage is not a ticket to wealth or stability or education. Instead, it is wealth, stability and education that make marriage a more reasonable possibility, and help maintain long marriages.
income inequality in the United States is extreme: the richest 1% of Americans have doubled their share of income in the past 30 years, while 80% of Americans have seen their share. A marriage may be economically advantageous to their partners share the costs, such as mortgage insurance, rent and health - but this is the case only if there are two sources of income, and for a couple with a steady income n ' is not in fact, in our current economy. Financial instability means a greater likelihood of divorce, it can be financially ruinous for women in particular.
marriage provides tangible benefits to men than single women. Married men spend hours less housework and childcare, especially if women stay at home, but even if you are married to women who work.
more free labor, married men with children are better paid just for that. They offer higher starting salaries than single women and mothers are often justified to be absent from work, and are perceived as more committed and competent. Women and mothers in particular, are not only penalized for the pay gap, but receive fewer promotions and are perceived as less competent.
In other words, heterosexual marriage allows a man's career flourish. For women, this means more work and less pay, or the precarious financial situation to stay home full time and hoping their marriage (and only source of income) lasts.
Aa> Women today expect more egalitarian relationships than they did a generation ago, and while men are more pro-feminist than ever, not accomplished a lot. (My advice to women. "Do not marry a man who does not pull his own weight") For many women married to macho men, a little money can reduce conflict: hiring a nanny or maid key, for example, does not just mean a clean home, which allows the couple to ignore the relegation of women to the domestic sphere. This allows them to believe that the relationship is relatively equal.- The nanny or housekeeper generally does not have this option and simply prefer the independence of marriage with a person who has to clean up after. Archaic notions of masculinity (and man as breadwinner) also prevent many workers consider themselves men bonding material.
- For women for whom college is not an option or has never been on his radar - a reality for many Americans - which is not the same incentive to wait until 'that they are 30 to get married and have children. Years in a low income job will not make you life more stable, and could lead to a slightly higher income. Marrying a partnership with the poorest prospects cause greater instability, if not ruin. However, having a child, even when they are young and single, can bring their social status, love and attention - not to mention temporary help with things like health insurance and housing.
Find best price for : --Leave--
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(102)
-
▼
February
(26)
- Reading 0-3 Wigan Athletic | Premier League match ...
- Blackpool 0-0 Leicester City | Championship match ...
- In praise of … If You See God, Tell Him | Editorial
- High culture versus pop culture: which is best for...
- Iain Duncan Smith: shelf-stacking as important as ...
- Michael Appleton settles in after ejecting circus ...
- Marco Rubio survives his water bottle moment with ...
- Should workplaces have on-site psychiatrists?
- Ronald Dworkin: a modern-day Mill | Editorial
- Rehabilitate Macbeth for Scotland? If you want his...
- Valentine's Day retailers say it with flawed surve...
- US plan aimed at shoring up US business networks
- NQT job tips: how to get that first teaching post
- Mid Staffs NHS scandal shows compassion is the qua...
- Michael Gove's gang perfect the art of fighting di...
- Poverty-stricken Indian women forced into prostitu...
- Education reform: a lesson to learn from | Editorial
- This is a job for super-wonk
- Michael Gove's GCSE U-turn is a reprieve for secon...
- The horsemeat scandal: could there be much more to...
- Public sector cuts hit judges' pensions
- Pro bono and access to justice: mind the gap
- Standard & Poor's feels Justice's lash, but can th...
- Let's not be wed to outmoded ideas of what marriag...
- Today's poor are depicted as a freak show, just as...
- Internet copyright law has to have public support ...
-
▼
February
(26)
0 comments:
Post a Comment