Children develop in different ways at different ages. Gove plan to convert some students second-class citizens in 14 years was unfair
Animation to seeEnglish Baccalaureate Certificate Michael Gove go up in flames - and not just because we thought desperately EBC. In short, GCSE is a good thing. I grew up in the era of O-levels, and 16-plus ESC - not a two-tier system, as it is called, but a three-tier system
The 16-plus GCSE was like when you could get something more high-pass low O CST step in examining it. Comprehensive schools, as he attended (the Kersal High Brightness, who unfortunately had to close) always chose the 16-plus they could, because he was right. But the gap was largest among those who have taken all levels and those who take the CST. You've done CST, which they were sent. And being relegated to the TSA left a second-class citizen in 14 years.
of a sudden, the GCSE removed it. A child who is struggling can work your way to an AC outlet or an intelligent, but could lead to a lower rank distracted. The important thing is that the outcome was not predetermined before the course starts.
Gove wanted to abolish it, apparently because he believes in the age of 14 is ordered our destination. We know who is the boss mob class and class, the rulers and the ruled, and it's silly to pretend otherwise
But, of course, for any society that aspires to be a meritocracy, this is absurd. Children develop at different ages and in different ways. Who can say that there is merit in addition to excelling in the history of computers? (In fact, the market suggest otherwise.)
- I have known many school children over the years, including my eldest daughter. I've never heard: "Oh, if the program were narrower than the more satisfying life?" The fact that there is a broad program means that not every opportunity to excel in traditional academic subjects, if they wish, while allowing others to be successful in various fields.
I also met many children who are struggling academically. My youngest daughter is on the autism spectrum. We were told as a child that it was unlikely to pass the exams. However, it has carefully chosen their GCSE subjects (including computers, theater, food technology - yes, those who despise Gove), worked very hard and spent his GCSEs. All a resounding success. Its comprehensive school are not too ambitious to be ready to go to A-levels (requiring five B), but insisted he had the right to do so. Once again, she carefully chosen topics, worked hard and ran his degree. Another resounding success. She scratched her way to college, where is now booming.
Find best price for : --Einstein----Gove----GCSE----Michael--
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(102)
-
▼
February
(26)
- Reading 0-3 Wigan Athletic | Premier League match ...
- Blackpool 0-0 Leicester City | Championship match ...
- In praise of … If You See God, Tell Him | Editorial
- High culture versus pop culture: which is best for...
- Iain Duncan Smith: shelf-stacking as important as ...
- Michael Appleton settles in after ejecting circus ...
- Marco Rubio survives his water bottle moment with ...
- Should workplaces have on-site psychiatrists?
- Ronald Dworkin: a modern-day Mill | Editorial
- Rehabilitate Macbeth for Scotland? If you want his...
- Valentine's Day retailers say it with flawed surve...
- US plan aimed at shoring up US business networks
- NQT job tips: how to get that first teaching post
- Mid Staffs NHS scandal shows compassion is the qua...
- Michael Gove's gang perfect the art of fighting di...
- Poverty-stricken Indian women forced into prostitu...
- Education reform: a lesson to learn from | Editorial
- This is a job for super-wonk
- Michael Gove's GCSE U-turn is a reprieve for secon...
- The horsemeat scandal: could there be much more to...
- Public sector cuts hit judges' pensions
- Pro bono and access to justice: mind the gap
- Standard & Poor's feels Justice's lash, but can th...
- Let's not be wed to outmoded ideas of what marriag...
- Today's poor are depicted as a freak show, just as...
- Internet copyright law has to have public support ...
-
▼
February
(26)
0 comments:
Post a Comment