Have a Good NEWS

social justice in the UK is expensive - and yes, we need to save money. But the cuts in this bill will end up costing a fortune

This argument becomes a little more than a single note. The government suggests a cut, and the injustice of the howling of documents as a singing Christmas card. They insist that all these points are debatable, because they can not afford social justice. Do you want to follow the same path as Greece? No? Well, then. The reduction in depth of £ 350 million in legal assistance or terminate through tarama face.

Let

experiment with a different approach. The whole case against the cuts to legal aid in terms of morality and good government, you can read elsewhere - in this debate in the House of Lords last month, for example. But what if this measure to save money will actually cost more than it saves?

Legal Aid

should be removed from these issues, including debt, employment, housing, family law and criminal negligence. Notwithstanding anything to the rest of legal aid for education, points to the center right of children to access "a good knowledge of education law appears to be a prerequisite for all parents in these measures ". Hopefully, Google will be able to help.

from now, the funds will be available for a quarter of a million fewer cases in family law, 140 000 fewer cases involving welfare benefits, debt participation of 110,000, 50,000 involve 30,000 homes and serious problems involving employment issues.

families are supposed to mediate while from now, except in cases of domestic violence. This will force the accusations of domestic violence, which are often buried in the interest of an agreement, but are likely to be exhumed, if no other option.

As cases become more complex and involved several agencies. The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux give these numbers to save money benefits of timely advice: a book on welfare benefits advice saves £ 8.80 in future spending every pound spent on housing counseling save £ 2 , 34, and every bit of advice debt saves £ 2.98. When a case is the court procedure has become the evil in the complication and expense. A policy that legal aid is not available until the client is "your home is in immediate danger" (in the case of debt) shows no understanding of this subject.

This derivation of the cost of one department to another, with the annoying side effect that the cost is much higher. Imagine also, if someone were to bring a case of human rights against a local council, it would be rare now. If there is a question about the responsibility of a board to a child or a case of a child who was excluded, all that today would be funded by legal aid. Once a channel has been removed by the ordinary courts are closed, and what once seemed that the nuclear option - an appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 2 of Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human human right to education - becomes the only option. The cost of taking a case with no win-no charge from the Supreme Court would be enough to ruin some municipalities.

Find best price for : --McNally----Penal----Howard----Callender----legal--