Monday, October 24, 2011

comments editor of the Guardian at the time of 9 / 11 in a violent response to those who had anticipated the reality of a war against terrorism

the moment the second plane hit the World Trade Center, the battle to define the attacks of 9 / 11 had already started on both sides of the Atlantic. United States President Bush made the fateful call for a war against terrorism, as the media joined in the flag. In Britain, Tony Blair, and their cheerleaders enthusiastically fell in line. Inevitably, they faced the opposition a little more absurd claim that the atrocities that had emerged from a clear blue sky, and the country must always follow superpower was injured.

But not much. The political response and media related to anyone what happened in New York and Washington in the U.S. and Western intervention in the Muslim world, or the issue of training for war, was wild.

From September 11, 2001, The Guardian (almost exclusively in the British press), however, indicated that these voices are heard, no doubt a major debate on the reasons for these attacks had taken place and how United States and the West should respond.

brushed reaction crazy. Curiously a decade later, the fact that The Guardian allowed writers to connect politics U.S. attacks in the world was treated as a traitor to his alleged "anti-Americanism."

Michael Gove, now a Conservative minister, wrote in The Guardian that he had become a "Prada-Meinhof" of the "fifth column". The novelist Robert Harris, then there is a big Blair denounced us to host a "babbling idiots" unable to understand that the world is now in a repeat of the war against Hitler.

The Telegraph has published a regular "useful idiots" column addressed to The Guardian, while Andrew Neil told the paper should be called the "Journal of terrorism" and the Sun by Richard Littlejohn we have been criticized as "anti-American propaganda fascist left-wing press."

that the Guardian has published articles only connecting points of U.S. policy against imperial or British-American attacks in Afghanistan. Nearby, in the early days, we find pieces of James Rubin, the Clinton administration assistant secretary, former NATO commander Wesley Clark, William Shawcross ("We are all Americans now") and columnist for the Jim Hoagland Washington Post, calling for revenge - including military retaliation support


But it is precisely in those early days, when the U.S. government was the creation of a catastrophic event, it was more urgent to refute Bush and Blair lying spin that it was an attack the "freedom" and our "lifestyle" - and nothing to do with what the United States. UU. (And Britain) had imposed the Middle East and elsewhere. And most of the 5000 emails I received in response, including the American readers, the argument goes.


Find best price for : --Ashdown----Paddy----Liberal----Vietnam----Madeleine----Street----Downing----Kabul----Galloway----George----Guardian----Bush----Trade----World--

0 comments:

Blog Archive