Monday, October 24, 2011

Universities

need to prove they can put their house in order, without the help of the private sector The private sector is incredible, right? It is easily the best in the industry. Apart from the voluntary sector, of course, that is humble and inspiring and should give us all a break. But, of course, is not really an industry itself. I mean it is vital - perhaps even more important than the other -. In the same way that the Paralympic Games is perhaps more important than the Olympics

But the other two sectors - I'm not sure it will be called "the two main sectors," because it is, I think, a very imaginative to see the vital voluntary sector - a private sector must be the best, right? It's like the free West, while the public sector is the Soviet Union, but without the nuclear threat: gray suits, gray offices, women and unattractive queues. You get the feeling of rockets, concrete and rain and puddles, as all 70, while the private sector is dynamic and 80. It is much more Dynasty

more

Howards Way

, more with-good-names as adjectives. This fax machines and swimming pools, and shoulder tell people where to stick, both professional and sexual context.

Yes, people working in the private sector must look to public sector workers in disbelief. How did you get there you think. What personality cocktail of laziness, self-hatred and poor insoluble attempted to capital (incredibly small, but with retirement benefits too generous can not tie the hands of the company) in the Mariana Trench dark bureaucratic, away from direct sunlight to feed the profit motive? How did the Sorting Hat to reach the destination of Hufflepuff of life (but with a touch of fire Slytherin when it comes to government contracts, local)

is the kind of questions that Carl Lygo, BPP CEO, Great Britain to run non-profit, university, should have to bite his tongue to stop asking to speak with other educators. Y

While there are many circumstances in which this is true. There is no doubt that public funds changing attitudes of the institution with money and can increase the propensity of residues. But I think it's a big leap from that observation to the current orthodoxy that the slowdown in the growth of the inefficiency of public and private sector production is inevitable and universal - that the private sector a kind of magic that, by dint of being paid by the state, one in the public has access, the private sector is always shining and the public always useless

Lygo suspects
subscribe to this view when he says: "We have many universities in the UK and not all are in a strong financial position ... the private provider would add an experienced back-office work. "What experience? Experience in the administration, for example, Bristol University who currently manage the University of Bristol, but not a new company that has never done before is to be filled? Do not use just the same people to do the job, but pay them less or a bag of a few? Do you mean by experience

No experience is cruelty, is the ranking of profits. What is Lygo offers universities the common people the opportunity to get rid of most of the problems inherent in their jobs. If you do not want to make the tough decisions, that is, if you doubt that you have the backbone to make efficiency savings, then we carry for you. Spend your problems we are relaxed by the consciousness. Not only a breach of the duty of universities, but also help to perpetuate the myth of the omnipotence of the public and private money to burn stupid idiocy.
The private sector has caused the credit crisis, financial crisis, the global recession. The public sector banks rescued and brought the world to the brink of ruin. When our railways were in the hands of the public who were in poor condition, unreliable and losses. In private hands, are not yet public money ends up in the hands of shareholders and more expensive tickets. The NHS is the health service the most effective of his countrymen, but so far the private sector and much less than that. The armed forces remain in the public sector and people rarely have reason to criticize their efficacy or compromise.

0 comments:

Blog Archive