Have a Good NEWS

Parliament is an important step in its slow elimination of pariah status in the United Kingdom regarding defamation

With the World Cup Rugby noise, the minister an SOS to the front bustle. The bullet, he said, was a few meters from the line. With one more push, the victory would be achieved. The speaker was Tom McNally, Minister of Justice, while addressing a conference on defamation earlier this month.

McNally should know. It has been a leader in the government's offer to change the law of defamation English, which for decades has cooled free speech scientists, bloggers, journalists, authors and charities worldwide.

Wednesday that the disc has received a further, a joint committee of Lords and Commons was presented in the draft Defamation Bill, which suggests a number of important improvements. Although legislation is still inadequate in some key areas, step by step, Parliament is the elimination of pariah status in the United Kingdom. So bad was the English law that the U.S. Congress introduced special measures to protect Americans against the courts of London, considered derogatory to the fundamental right to freedom of expression. When the Special Committee on Culture published a report on the rules of defamation, privacy and the press in March 2010, described the U.S. decision as a "national humiliation".

Once the majority of members do not see what the excitement. In November 2009, when the Index on Censorship, English PEN and Sense About Science has launched the reform campaign of denigration, some suggested that there was not much of a problem. However, in four months, he had persuaded the three major parties to reform their election promise. Immediately after the election Lord Lester introduced the private member's bill, adapted to the laws of the government of Lord McNally.

This bill, welcome as it was, proved deficient in several important areas. He could not set the bar high enough to prevent large corporations from libel suits threaten to halt legitimate research - a tactic that many newspapers have suffered

We must do more to protect Internet service providers, capturing all the petitions to terminate an "offense" element, even if they can play no role in its publication and may not be able to determine whether the claims are simply intimidation.

and should have gone much further in determining the public interest, which is the foundation of good investigative journalism.

is not good news. Despite the displacement of the Committee on a strong public interest defense in light of the resources of the editor (a key issue for bloggers), I still think you have to do more to ensure that the defense is solid and accessible. And certain provisions of web forums and social media, particularly in relation to anonymous comments, can be problematic.

Find best price for : --Cameron----David----Clegg----Nick----Clarke----Lord----justice----Rugby--