Have a Good NEWS

Fury

with changers Jesus was born of anger with the system itself. However, unlike the campers, their protest was violent

For now, at least, the trustees of St. Paul does not seem to go back. An investment in a little comedy, Dean highlighted, while the protesters could remain until 2012. However, the staff of the cathedral can find solace in the fact that the protesters camped peacefully at the bottom of the sacred precincts, while his own master was much worse behavior. Instead of squatting with a sign outside the temple in Jerusalem, he made his protest within its walls, and was one. Non-violent and peaceful

The altercation Jesus created the most sacred places, the expulsion of the moneychangers and overturned their tables, it was probably enough to be executed. Strike in the temple was to attack the heart of Judaism. It arrived traveling with a background of the show was a boor direct challenge to the authority of the chief priests. Even some of his colleagues would probably have seen this amazing act of defiance that nothing less than sacrilege.

not tell us whether the riot police (guardians of the temple) dragged him but surely he would have felt fully justified in doing so. Some members of the Jewish ruling caste was looking for an excuse to close the mouth of the populist agitator. They were afraid that in the charged atmosphere of Easter, which could lead to an uprising that would force the entire Roman imperial power on the heads of the Jews unhappy. If the priests were really looking for an excuse to kill, Jesus seems to have delivered to them on a plate. Shortly after this piece of political theater, he was dead. Not only dead, but crucified, crucifixion was a Roman punishment reserved primarily for political crimes. They were set up to public view as a warning to other potential rebels.

There was a point of view, however, that this kind of parody of real sacrifice. The gift that was offered was not really clean, or at least was only for a short time. God had to give something that was part of his life, not something of the form. Like the Pharisees, with whom he had much in common that the attention of most Christians believe, Jesus seems to have been of this opinion. He thought that the gift must be somewhat intimate expression of the donor, and the system of the temple broken this vital link. The whole process has become automated and impersonal.