Wednesday, December 28, 2011

phone hacking, and social media, we must work together to maintain the highest ethical standards

Imagine if, in the last two decades, a particularly persistent thief had made it their business to target the property of the rich and famous. Imagine that was after celebrities - pop stars, actresses, footballers - and discovered he was off the hook. In addition, the police had no idea what he was doing.

It has expanded its ambitions and was a thief of the members of the royal family, the Governor of the Bank of England, the terrorists and even journalists who pass the laws he broke out: MPs . Flushed with success, backbenchers have, then, ministers, and even - the most brazen of all - the Prime Minister. I guess then discovered that, far from acting quickly to capture, arrest and charge him, the Metropolitan Police (who knew something about their activities), was initially inactive for the list of victims grew and grown.

What is the difference between this and the phone hacking scandal that has engulfed some of the major media companies in Britain? The phone-hacking scandal is not hypothetical.

still do not know with certainty the extent of it. Some of the people who say their phones have been cut can not be victims, after all. However, it seems certain that many of them - the same media companies targeting

is one of the greatest scandals in public life for decades, yet our response has been weak. Police were slow to respond, which may be related to its close links with the media. Sir Paul Stephenson, the Metropolitan police commissioner, said recently that he preferred that his men were investigating the most serious crimes such as theft. But it is theft of private information is the flight?

And if the Press Complaints Commission is fit for purpose, his recent behavior is not evidence.

This is particularly unfortunate coming at a time when the conduct of the media is under great pressure from advances in technology, and the distinction between what is public and that's what the public interest, it is more difficult to do.

But laws mean nothing if they are not met. It makes sense to pass laws without the sincere efforts to address the prohibited conduct. And so, while hacking the phone that the problem was not to have laws in the wrong place, but rather by not applying the law correctly, so that in the era of social media the idea of ??a Privacy Act is both impossible and naive.

As a result, there have been times this past year when I opened the main newspapers of red and despair of their sensationalism. But if the values ??in red above are the price we pay for an open society, I would prefer - with all the attendant controversies and lust -. On closed minds raised by a less free press


Find best price for : --Lebedev----Evgeny----Facebook----Twitter----Goodwin----Fred----Bank----Imagine--

0 comments:

Blog Archive