Have a Good NEWS

There was little sympathy for Liverpool striker, after his eight matches ban, with the club and the manager is facing criticism over

The reaction of the media ban Luis Suarez eight games and £ 40,000 fine for racial abuse of Patrice Evra of Manchester United, was frantic and largely favorable to the Liverpool striker. "Guilty," screams the Daily Mail page again. "Racist" is the option of the owner of the Daily Mirror, while the Daily Express simply choose the word "prohibited".

columnists, now free from having to write a complex and lengthy process that has boomed on Patrice Evra Suarez and comments to the attention of the world after the 1-1 draw with Manchester United Liverpool at Anfield on October 15 have largely supported the intransigent position of the FA and pointed an accusing finger at Liverpool and Suarez.

Merseyside

The correspondent of the Daily Mirror, David Maddock, said that the implications for Liverpool, which issued a strong statement in defense of the Uruguayan striker after the FA issued a verdict, not only can damage the computer, but the reputation of the director, Kenny Dalglish, whose image appears in line with the title "Betrayed" written on it.

"For a club of the stature, worthy of the history so that its star player convicted of a crime by the FA after arguing vehemently strikes at the heart of his credibility," Maddock wrote. "The questions also ask why the club was so quick to accept the explanation of the events of his players on that fateful afternoon in October, when Evra first made his allegations. There was no internal investigation into the incident, and Dalglish is feel betrayed, because their reputation is made on the embers, with his club because he had a right to expect the player to give all the facts. There was also a right to expect more than Suarez. "

Paul Joyce in the Daily Express believes that the guilty verdict in Suárez stay with the rest of his career. "The stain on his character is that it will be difficult to change. Is that stigma is more harmful than the previous eight-game ban he received." The unconditional support of the Liverpool striker is also questionable. "Liverpool must now tread carefully. Continuing their unequivocal support to Suarez comes with no apparent acceptance that he did not need to engage with Evra. The fact that they simply could have turned the other cheek. "

colleague Joyce John Dillon is far more scathing in his criticism of Suarez and paints a picture of the FA as brave. "After all the good work to eradicate racism in English football, which had no other choice. Do not bottle, "he wrote before rejecting the argument that cultural differences are taken into account in determining the guilt of Suarez. "Another soft edges here was the attempt to represent what Suarez has little more than a cultural aberration ... that does not wash. Suárez lives in our culture. There are hundreds of players in English football who do not perceive cultural nuances of the words of Suarez and in no way be expected to understand. "

Black

bold

, which does not really matter now . Sometimes it not what you say as much as how you say, and how often, "writes James Lawton in The Independent." The instinct is that a difficult, but indispensable, it became . And you may ask, against what exactly? Luck is the idea that racism, but it manifests itself, is not in English football was exceeded. "

Find best price for : --Mail----Ladyman----James----Dillon----John----Joyce----Dalglish----Suárez----Express----Daily----Evra----Patrice----Manchester----Luis----Liverpool--