Sunday, December 25, 2011

There is much speculation about David Cameron has called the elections in March. But it's really indisputable

shadow chancellor, Ed Balls, told The Independent this week that it would be "national interest" senior Liberal Democrats - but not its leader, Nick Clegg - to form a coalition with Labour, and to establish a new government without elections. Imagine the balls they have learned, after Gordon Brown could not go in the country after taking over as Prime Minister, that the electorate is not interested in politicians ignoring the little they have through democratic mandate. But apparently not. Politicians, almost by definition, I think the national interest always coincides with their own interests spookily. That's why we think it should be supported.

Technically, as a change of government could be achieved. There is much speculation about David Cameron has called the elections in March, when he is leading the polls, games of chance to get a conservative majority. But it's really not an option. In virtually his only politically astute move, the Liberal Democrats have insisted, as part of the coalition agreement in five years, fixed-term governments. An outgoing Prime Minister can not call an election when he thinks suits him best. This means, at this stage that the support of the Liberal Democrats is more a hindrance than a help conservatives. On the contrary, until the work can win an election, the Liberal Democrats to better serve exactly where they are.

The only real option open to the Liberal Democrats is an agreement of trust and power, as many of his supporters wanted the first left. Again, this means a return to government jobs. But at least some of the true self-sacrifice, he would eventually be obvious. However, after having been so excited about Conservative policy, therefore, the Lib Dem problem is now to find a cause and performance powerful enough to justify such a position. If the Liberal Democrats could reach more than a sentimental attachment to the idea of ??the European Community as a reason to oppose the Conservatives at the beginning, then there would be no problem. However, it seems more about political solutions to their friends in Europe by the channel. Even countries that are clearly in favor of Europe, with nothing to do with the ambivalence that has always been present in Britain, we find that such ideas are difficult to obtain. The closest Clegg to oppose Cameron was in his parody of tax deductions for married couples. But this is a minor irritant in a political culture that is constantly looking to find the levers of behavior in the systems, instead of really cool ways to interpret human psychology. This is more of a fight for the sake of a political position. The marriage of convenience cable proved to be suitable only if you enjoy watching political pluralism in neutral, and the "old politics", not fit for purpose as they are stronger and more relentless in adversity. It's a horrible sight, depressing.


Liberal-Conservative coalition Liberal Democrats


Find best price for : --Miliband----Clegg----Nick----Independent--

0 comments:

Blog Archive