Have a Good NEWS

Lib Dem leader is losing the battle to keep the benefit of the school?

Let the public services are run for profit

is politically risky. Nick Clegg, admitted that when he appeared to rule out profit in education in a speech in September.

Deputy Prime Minister said, "anyone who is concerned that expanding the range of suppliers in our education system, we are moving slowly towards the inclusion of the profit motive in our system the school, once again, let them say .. more diverse, yes to more choices for parents, but not the application of profit schools, not in our education sector funded State "

At that time, aid Michael Gove told reporters that it was the position before the party conference Clegg. Secretary of Education, said Andrew Marr did not need to profit "at the time." It was an artificial conflict.

Of course, there is nothing that prevents schools free rental for their management to private companies for a fee. And it happened, a for-profit company won a £ 21 million contract to manage a proposed free school in Suffolk

magazine that offers investor education by the Swedish firm IES UK - the local arm of an experienced operator of the school - was imposed on Edison Learning, and a coalition Wey with education - the company headed by former president of the Ofsted Zenna Atkins.

the company told investors it intends to "play an important role as a provider of outsourced services to public school ... take control of all daily aspects such schools "

there were eight expressions of interest for the £ 21 million contract to run the school Breckland free, says the magazine.

There is precedent for this, Edison spent three years between 2007 and 2010, the execution of a set in Enfield, north London. In other words, it is not an innovation. Was the case in the work.

But a policy of encouraging parents and schools has always been the risk of leading to the private sector. Competition for the school of Suffolk is an indication of a growing market.

argue that private companies can provide expert groups may lack parental education, as well as economies of scale that come with the chains of school operations - its much cheaper for schools from back office functions such as payroll, for example. How could it be dangerous? The obvious fear is that the management of profit schools have a powerful motive to reduce costs. Since the cost is higher teacher salaries, there would be pressure to hire a lot of younger staff, you can pay less.

that Geoffrey Canada, founder of the nonprofit Children Zone in Harlem, put it in criticizing American public schools in the conference last year, the Conservative party:
"The education sector is a billion dollars just to tolerate failure. Any other matter is not so spectacular fifty years, would be out of business. "

Find best price for : --Clegg----Nick----Suffolk----Edison----Michael--